BenchMarker - Writing Flaw Detection: leaderboard

Metric: Cohen's kappa (-1 to 1) between the judge and human labels on 3,419 judgments of whether a question from an NLP benchmark breaks one of 19 item-writing rules (Tarrant et al.), one prompt per rule with its definition and six examples; validation items were sampled from the training splits of 12 NLP multiple-choice datasets, stratified by GPT-5's own BenchMarker predictions (up to ten items predicted flawed and ten predicted not flawed per dataset), then labeled by a researcher with a second annotator checking agreement; default decoding, JSON verdict; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 23 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Pro0.53#145
2GPT-50.5#91
3Claude Sonnet 4.50.48#138
4Gemini 2.5 Flash0.47#237
5GPT-5 Mini (2025-08-07)0.38#165
6Claude Haiku 4.5 (20251001)0.38#251
7c4ai-command-r-08-20240.38#907
8Command-R+ (08-2024)0.36#806
9Qwen 3 32B0.35#424
10Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite0.35#413
11Qwen 3 14B0.34#524
12Qwen 3 8B0.33#667
13Qwen 3 4B0.32#823
14GPT-5 Nano0.22#415
15Gemma 3 4B (IT)0.2#971

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=benchmarker-writing-flaw-detection · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.