BehaviorBench (Behavioral Traces) - Trade Direction (RetrievalGen): leaderboard

BehaviorBench (Yang et al., 2026) tests whether a model can predict what a real pseudonymous user will do, using 2,000 wallets reconstructed from public prediction-market and on-chain records with chronologically held-out targets. The model sees behavior of similar wallets retrieved from a separate support pool (RetrievalGen). The board is the accuracy in percent of predicting whether the next transaction of the user is a buy or a sell; chance is 50 and higher is better.

Metric: Direction accuracy (%): predicted BUY or SELL of the next transaction; history interface RetrievalGen (behaviorally similar examples retrieved from a disjoint support pool of wallets); 2,000 pseudonymous prediction-market wallets reconstructed from public Polymarket metadata and Polygon on-chain logs, about 59,560 chronologically held-out test transactions; unparsable outputs count as failures; chance 50, context-only baseline 52.85; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.468.86#123
2Claude 3.7 Sonnet66.67#458
3GPT-5.4 Mini65.07#389
4Claude Opus 463.92#322
5Gemma 3 27B (IT)60.55#1289
6Llama 4 Scout Instruct60.46#1543
7NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF1660.2#1767
8GPT-OSS-20B59.99#1147
9Gemma 3 12B (IT)59.82#1837
10Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-251250.67#1593
11GPT-5.4 Nano50.38#635

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=behaviorbench-behavioral-traces-trade-direction-retrievalgen · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.