BehaviorBench (Behavioral Traces) - Trade Direction (ProfileGen): leaderboard

BehaviorBench (Yang et al., 2026) tests whether a model can predict what a real pseudonymous user will do, using 2,000 wallets reconstructed from public prediction-market and on-chain records with chronologically held-out targets. The model sees a structured profile summarizing the past behavior of the wallet (ProfileGen). The board is the accuracy in percent of predicting whether the next transaction of the user is a buy or a sell; chance is 50 and higher is better.

Metric: Direction accuracy (%): predicted BUY or SELL of the next transaction; history interface ProfileGen (a released structured profile summarizing the wallet's pre-target behavior); 2,000 pseudonymous prediction-market wallets reconstructed from public Polymarket metadata and Polygon on-chain logs, about 59,560 chronologically held-out test transactions; unparsable outputs count as failures; chance 50, context-only baseline 52.85; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 469.57#322
2GPT-5.469.11#123
3GPT-5.4 Mini67.61#389
4Claude 3.7 Sonnet67.58#458
5Gemma 3 12B (IT)64.57#1837
6Llama 4 Scout Instruct63.47#1543
7NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF1662.66#1767
8Gemma 3 27B (IT)61.35#1289
9GPT-OSS-20B60.69#1147
10GPT-5.4 Nano57.94#635
11Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-251253.69#1593

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=behaviorbench-behavioral-traces-trade-direction-profilegen · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.