BehaviorBench (Behavioral Traces) - Trade Amount Error (DirectGen): leaderboard

BehaviorBench (Yang et al., 2026) tests whether a model can predict what a real pseudonymous user will do, using 2,000 wallets reconstructed from public prediction-market and on-chain records with chronologically held-out targets. The model sees the recent raw history of the wallet (DirectGen). The board is the median absolute error of the predicted transaction amount, in paper units and unbounded; lower is better.

Metric: Median absolute error of the predicted trade amount (paper units, unbounded); history interface DirectGen (the target wallet's most recent visible history, up to 30 events for Belief); 2,000 pseudonymous prediction-market wallets reconstructed from public Polymarket metadata and Polygon on-chain logs, about 59,560 chronologically held-out test transactions; unparsable outputs count as failures; context-only baseline 31.79; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemma 3 12B (IT)8.34#1837
2Gemma 3 27B (IT)9#1289
3Llama 4 Scout Instruct9.14#1543
4Claude 3.7 Sonnet9.49#458
5GPT-5.49.63#123
6GPT-5.4 Mini9.8#389
7NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF169.95#1767
8GPT-OSS-20B10.4#1147
9GPT-5.4 Nano11.37#635
10Claude Opus 412.47#322
11Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-251221.99#1593

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=behaviorbench-behavioral-traces-trade-amount-error-directgen · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.