BehaviorBench (Behavioral Traces) - Belief Choice (RetrievalGen): leaderboard

BehaviorBench (Yang et al., 2026) tests whether a model can predict what a real pseudonymous user will do, using 2,000 wallets reconstructed from public prediction-market and on-chain records with chronologically held-out targets. The model sees behavior of similar wallets retrieved from a separate support pool (RetrievalGen). The board is the accuracy in percent of predicting the side (YES or NO) the user finally holds in a market; chance is 50 and higher is better.

Metric: Choice accuracy (%): predicted final revealed side (YES or NO) of the wallet in the target market; history interface RetrievalGen (behaviorally similar examples retrieved from a disjoint support pool of wallets); 2,000 pseudonymous prediction-market wallets reconstructed from public Polymarket metadata and Polygon on-chain logs, 22,204 chronologically held-out wallet-market test instances; chance 50, context-only baseline 53.13; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.471.03#123
2Claude Opus 470.22#322
3Gemma 3 12B (IT)70.06#1837
4Gemma 3 27B (IT)69.89#1289
5Claude 3.7 Sonnet69.61#458
6GPT-5.4 Mini66.96#389
7GPT-5.4 Nano66.8#635
8Llama 4 Scout Instruct65.12#1543
9GPT-OSS-20B62.76#1147
10NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF1660.79#1767
11Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-251260.43#1593

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=behaviorbench-behavioral-traces-belief-choice-retrievalgen · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.