BAGEN - Search-R1 - F1@All: leaderboard

BAGEN (Budget-Aware Agent, arXiv 2606.00198) on Search-R1 multi-turn search QA rollouts, remaining cost in tokens: a model replays every prefix of its own logged agent rollouts and must say whether the task can still finish within budget. Unlike task-success or cost leaderboards, "it asks the agent itself to predict its remaining" cost mid-task. Score: all-turn feasibility macro-F1 (%) over feasible and impossible prefixes. Each model is scored on its own rollouts, so item sets differ per model; settings from the paper's Table 5 (Claude effort low, GPT-5.2 reasoning none, Gemini and Qwen thinking low). Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00198

Metric: All-turn feasibility macro-F1 (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 5 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.7 (Low)40.5#51 (Claude Opus 4.7)
2GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)38.3#115 (GPT-5.2)
3Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Low)33.3#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Low)24.8#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
5Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct23.9#315

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=bagen-search-r1-f1-all · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.