BacktestBench: leaderboard

Quantitative backtesting is essential for evaluating trading strategies but remains hampered by high technical barriers and limited scalability. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a transformative path to automate this complex, interdisciplinary workflow through advanced code generation, tool usage, and agentic planning, the practical realization is significantly challenged by the current la

Metric: Overall Accuracy (OA) (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Around December 2026. 23 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro67.41#80
2Qwen 3 Max61.84#208
3Seed 1.860.58#139
4GLM-4.756.83#192
5Qwen 3 235B A22B55.01#313
6DeepSeek V3.250.7#205
7GPT-OSS-120B49.56#341
8Qwen 3 32B47.81#443
9Qwen 3 30B A3B47.03#493
10MiniMax-M2.145.91#289
11Kimi K2 (Thinking)44.97#243 (Kimi K2)
12Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B44.06#320
13Qwen 3 Coder Plus42.05#338
14MiMo-V2-Flash40.43#372
15Qwen 3 14B36.97#537

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=backtestbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.