AutomationBench-AA - Strict: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis evaluates agents carrying out workplace objectives subject to guardrails. The headline score adjusts objective completion for violations; the strict board requires full task success. Both are percentages from the complete public model roster.

Metric: Strict Task Success (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 243 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 4 Carbon (High)55.25#1 (Gemini 4 Carbon)
2Gemini 4 Argon (High)53.12#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
3Kimi K3.1 Pro45.97#17
4Muse Wonder Full (Max)45.36#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
5GPT-6 Astra (Max)41.55#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
6GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)39.42#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
7Muse Wonder (Max)39.12#18 (Muse Wonder)
8MiniMax-M3.1-Flash38.05#52
9Grok 4.7 (xHigh)37.75#26 (Grok 4.7)
10Grok 4.7 (High)37.75#26 (Grok 4.7)
11GPT-6 Astra (High)37.44#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
12GPT-6.1 Sol (xHigh)37.14#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
13GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)36.99#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
14DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (Max)36.68#27 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017))
15DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (High)35.77#27 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017))

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=automationbench-aa-strict · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.