ASTRA-bench: leaderboard

Metric: Task-completion score of a gpt-5.1-2025-11-13 judge against the human-authored success conditions (rescaled 0-1, shown times 100), macro-averaged over the low, moderate and high tranches of the referential, functional and informational complexity axes; 2,413 human-authored personal-assistant scenarios over the protagonists' email, calendar, messaging and phone histories in a stateful sandbox with 25+ tools; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.591.12#79
2DeepSeek V3.290.5#198
3O387.82#121
4GPT-4.179.22#240
5Claude Haiku 4.576.46#271
6Qwen 3 235B A22B69.02#304
7Qwen 3 30B A3B65.67#488

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=astra-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.