AlpacaEval 2.0: leaderboard

Automated instruction-following evaluation using length-controlled win rates against GPT-4 Turbo. 805 prompts scored by an LLM judge. Fast, cheap, and highly correlated with Chatbot Arena.

Metric: LC Win Rate (%). Source: tatsu-lab.github.io. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 223 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1gemma-2-9B-it-SimPO72.35#580
2gemma-2-9B-it-DPO67.66#678
3GPT-4o (2024-05-13)57.46#325
4GPT-4 Turbo55.02#404
5Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620)52.37#299
6GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)50.73#558
7Llama-3-Instruct-8B-SimPO44.65#1048
8Qwen 1.5 110B Chat43.91#691
9Nanbeige2-16B-Chat40.59#978
10Claude 3 Opus (20240229)40.51#412
11Llama 3.1 405B Instruct39.26#457
12GPT-438.13#438
13Qwen 2 72B Instruct38.07#576
14Llama 3.1 70B Instruct38.06#561
15Qwen 1.5 72B Chat36.57#776

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=alpacaeval-2-0 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.