aiXamine - Fairness & Bias: leaderboard

aiXamine Fairness & Bias service score: consistency and impartiality across social groups on Adult, gender-care, preference and BBQ tests (aiXamine, arXiv 2608.20554v1, Appendix Table 7). Normalized 0-100 score aggregated from the service's tests; higher is better. 42 models evaluated under identical black-box conditions via OpenRouter or containerized vLLM.

Metric: Service score (0-100; normalized pass rate). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2028. 42 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemma 4 31B79#212
2Gemma 4 26B A4B77.5#360
3Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)76.7#90
4GPT-OSS-120B72.9#346
5Phi-472#707
6Qwen 3.5 27B71.2#192
7GPT-5 Mini68.8#193
8GPT-OSS-20B67.6#523
9GPT-4o67.5#357
10Gemini 2.0 Flash (001)66.9#365
11Gemma 4 E4B65.8#762
12Llama 3.1 8B65.7#1130
13Gemma 2 27B64.7#803
14Qwen 3.5 122B A10B64.3#184
15DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B64#860

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=aixamine-fairness-bias · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.