AIDABench - Easy: leaderboard

Metric: Score (%) on the 178 easy tasks (at most 6 expert operation steps), best of three runs per task (pass@3), AIDABench's 603 end-to-end data-analytics tasks over real business files (mostly spreadsheets, up to 14 files per task); the model works in a Python sandbox through one execute_code tool (at most 20 calls) with an auxiliary spreadsheet summary, provider-recommended decoding; QA answers are judged pass/fail by QwQ-32B against the reference, charts get a 0-1 rubric score from a Gemini-3-Pro-Preview judge, spreadsheets pass/fail from a Claude-Sonnet-4.5 file evaluator; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)86.97#64
2Claude Sonnet 4.584.34#138
3DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)83.67#198 (DeepSeek V3.2)
4DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)83.25#198 (DeepSeek V3.2)
5Kimi K2 (Thinking)80.16#236 (Kimi K2)
6Qwen 3 Max (2026-01-23)79.84#151
7Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct78.52#291
8Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)73.79#366 (Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507)
9Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct64.35#464

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=aidabench-easy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.