AgentNoiseBench (Search, Tool Noise): leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy on 500 sampled 2WikiMultiHopQA and HotpotQA questions answered with a search tool (mean of the two) with tool noise injected into tool returns (execution failures, incomplete, erroneous, misleading or redundant outputs); noise produced by a fixed generator whose prompt was optimized to degrade a reference agent while keeping every task solvable; task success rate (fraction times 100), mean of four trials; the paper's stability-gated criterion counts a task solved only with a correct final outcome and no noise-induced deviation in the trajectory; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 24 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)39#246 (GLM-4.6)
2GPT-5.2 (Thinking)37#105 (GPT-5.2)
3DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)37#260 (DeepSeek V3.1)
4GLM-4.5 (Thinking)37#265 (GLM-4.5)
5DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)36#227 (DeepSeek V3.2 Exp)
6GLM-4.6 (Thinking)36#246 (GLM-4.6)
7GLM-4.5 (Non-reasoning)36#265 (GLM-4.5)
8O335#121
9Qwen 3 Max (Thinking)33#201 (Qwen 3 Max)
10Claude Sonnet 4 (Thinking)31#194 (Claude Sonnet 4)
11Gemini 2.5 Pro30#145
12Claude Sonnet 430#194
13LongCat-Flash-Chat30#322
14Claude Sonnet 4.529#138
15Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)29#138 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=agentnoisebench-search-tool-noise · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.