AgentGym2 - Data Analysis: leaderboard

End-to-end data analysis scenario of AgentGym2 (2026): 57 tasks over attached files that include data cleaning and computation. Mean success over three runs in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Task success (%; Avg@3 on the 57 end-to-end data analysis tasks, data cleaning included; mean over three runs of the share of tasks answered correctly (Avg@3), short string or numeric answers graded CORRECT by a Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 judge; ReAct agent with OpenAI tool schemas, tools to be discovered in a de-idealized environment with noisy or underspecified inputs, at most 100 interaction rounds, temperature 0.6, thinking mode as printed per model). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)39.77#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
2GPT-539.18#167
3DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)20.47#497 (DeepSeek V3.1)
4Kimi K216.96#439
5DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)13.45#438 (DeepSeek V3.2 Exp)
6Gemini 2.5 Pro12.28#266
7Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct9.94#619
8GLM-4.68.19#486
9Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)2.92#463
10Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)2.34#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
11Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)1.75#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
12Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)1.75#1830 (Qwen 3 8B)
13Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)0#1830 (Qwen 3 8B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=agentgym2-data-analysis · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.