AgentGym2 - Complex Tool Usage: leaderboard
Metric: Task success (%; Avg@3 on the 182 complex tool usage tasks; mean over three runs of the share of tasks answered correctly (Avg@3), short string or numeric answers graded CORRECT by a Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 judge; ReAct agent with OpenAI tool schemas, tools to be discovered in a de-idealized environment with noisy or underspecified inputs, at most 100 interaction rounds, temperature 0.6, thinking mode as printed per model). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2026. 15 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 48.72 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) | 42.38 |
| 3 | DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | 23.26 |
| 4 | GLM-4.6 | 22.16 |
| 5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | 21.25 |
| 6 | Kimi K2 | 19.96 |
| 7 | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) | 19.6 |
| 8 | Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct | 12.27 |
| 9 | Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking) | 7.33 |
| 10 | Qwen 3 32B (Thinking) | 6.41 |
| 11 | Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning) | 6.21 |
| 12 | Qwen 3 8B (Thinking) | 4.58 |
| 13 | Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning) | 2.75 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=agentgym2-complex-tool-usage · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-29.