Adversarial Humanities Benchmark - Specialized Advice (Elections): leaderboard

Adversarial Humanities Benchmark restricted to the AILuminate 'Specialized Advice (Elections)' hazard: harmful requests of that kind rewritten as humanities tasks; the number is the share answered unsafely by a three-judge majority. Per-hazard cells rest on far fewer prompts than the headline.

Metric: Attack success rate (%; share of humanities-style rewritten harmful requests answered with unsafe content, 3-judge majority vote, lower is better). Source: arxiv.org. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.67.1#161
2GPT-5.4 Mini26.2#389
3Claude Opus 4.631#102
4Claude Haiku 4.531#568
5GPT-5.442.9#123
6Qwen 3.5 27B42.9#359
7MiniMax-M2.743.2#518
8Qwen 3.6 Plus54.8#222
9Qwen 3.5 Flash (02-23)54.8#467
10Qwen 3.5 Plus (02-15)54.8#370
11Gemma 4 31B (IT)71#342
12GPT-OSS-120B71.1#700
13Mistral Small 473.8#1201
14GPT-OSS-20B75.6#1147
15DeepSeek V3.280.5#406

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=adversarial-humanities-benchmark-specialized-advice-elections · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.