Adversarial Humanities Benchmark - Sexual Content: leaderboard

Adversarial Humanities Benchmark restricted to the AILuminate 'Sexual Content' hazard: harmful requests of that kind rewritten as humanities tasks; the number is the share answered unsafely by a three-judge majority. Per-hazard cells rest on far fewer prompts than the headline.

Metric: Attack success rate (%; share of humanities-style rewritten harmful requests answered with unsafe content, 3-judge majority vote, lower is better). Source: arxiv.org. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.66.4#161
2Claude Haiku 4.517.4#568
3Claude Opus 4.619.1#102
4Qwen 3.5 27B22.7#359
5Qwen 3.5 Flash (02-23)22.7#467
6GPT-5.4 Mini27.1#389
7GPT-5.429.2#123
8MiniMax-M2.729.3#518
9Qwen 3.6 Plus31.8#222
10Qwen 3.5 Plus (02-15)34.1#370
11Seed-1.635.4#448
12GPT-OSS-20B37#1147
13Llama 4 Scout Instruct37.5#1543
14Seed 2.0 Lite43.6#289
15Qwen 3 Max (Thinking)45.7#403 (Qwen 3 Max)

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=adversarial-humanities-benchmark-sexual-content · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.