Adversarial Humanities Benchmark - Defamation: leaderboard

Adversarial Humanities Benchmark restricted to the AILuminate 'Defamation' hazard: harmful requests of that kind rewritten as humanities tasks; the number is the share answered unsafely by a three-judge majority. Per-hazard cells rest on far fewer prompts than the headline.

Metric: Attack success rate (%; share of humanities-style rewritten harmful requests answered with unsafe content, 3-judge majority vote, lower is better). Source: arxiv.org. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.617.4#102
2Claude Sonnet 4.619.6#161
3GPT-5.4 Mini26.1#389
4MiniMax-M2.731.8#518
5Qwen 3.5 27B33.3#359
6Claude Haiku 4.537.8#568
7Qwen 3.5 Flash (02-23)44.4#467
8GPT-5.445.7#123
9Qwen 3.5 Plus (02-15)51.1#370
10Qwen 3.6 Plus55.6#222
11GPT-OSS-120B59.1#700
12Llama 4 Scout Instruct64.4#1543
13Qwen 3 Max (Thinking)64.4#403 (Qwen 3 Max)
14Mistral Small 465.2#1201
15GPT-OSS-20B66.7#1147

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=adversarial-humanities-benchmark-defamation · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.