AdvancedMathBench - VerifierBench: leaderboard

VerifierBench of AdvancedMathBench (Shanghai AI Laboratory, 2026) tests models as proof verifiers on 888 model-generated proof trajectories with expert labels. This board is the meta-verification balanced F1 in percent, where a verdict counts only when its rationale and error localization agree with the expert annotation; higher is better.

Metric: Meta-verification balanced F1 (%): a validity verdict counts only when its rationale and error localization agree with the expert annotation, 888 model-generated proof trajectories with expert labels; balanced F1 is the harmonic mean of the true positive and true negative rates; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)65.1#188 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
2GPT-5.5 (xHigh)64.9#49 (GPT-5.5)
3GPT-5.5 (High)63.6#49 (GPT-5.5)
4GLM-5.2 (Max)63.3#138 (GLM-5.2)
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B58.5#246
6GPT-5.2 (xHigh)57.7#176 (GPT-5.2)
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)55.2#94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
8Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)51#56 (Claude Opus 4.8)
9GPT-OSS-120B (High)47.9#700 (GPT-OSS-120B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=advancedmathbench-verifierbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.