AbstentionBench - underspecified intent - SituatedQA/Geo - F1: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified intent - SituatedQA/Geo - F1 as Abstention F1 (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention F1 (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o70.99#357
2O166.44#190
3Llama 3.3 70B Instruct64.46#541
4Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO64.04#732
5Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B63.28#499
6Llama 3.1 8B Instruct63.08#1017
7Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B62.66#848
8Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO60.53#992
9Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)59.85#1255
10Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct58.68#509
11Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT56.72#977
12Llama 3.1 405B Instruct54.23#470
13Llama 3.1 70B Instruct54.18#567
14DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B53.48#614
15OLMo-7B-0724-Instruct-hf53.11#1441

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-intent-situatedqa-geo-f1 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.