AbstentionBench - underspecified intent - KUQ/Ambiguous - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified intent - KUQ/Ambiguous - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B82.63#614
2Llama 3.1 70B79.78#588
3Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT79.33#977
4Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B79.22#848
5O179.05#190
6GPT-4o77.63#357
7Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO76.73#992
8Llama 3.1 8B76.56#1130
9Gemini 1.5 Pro74.27#454
10Llama 3.3 70B Instruct73.88#541
11Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B70.89#499
12Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO70.71#732
13Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)70.63#1255
14OLMo-7B-0724-Instruct-hf69.23#1441
15Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct69.18#509

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-intent-kuq-ambiguous-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.