AbstentionBench - underspecified context - WorldSense - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified context - WorldSense - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O189.25#190
2Llama 3.1 405B Instruct87.48#470
3DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B86.18#614
4Gemini 1.5 Pro85.81#454
5GPT-4o84.83#357
6Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct77.27#509
7Llama 3.1 70B76.86#588
8Llama 3.1 8B67.76#1130
9Llama 3.1 70B Instruct66.7#567
10Llama 3.3 70B Instruct65.2#541
11Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B51.75#499
12Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO51.17#732
13OLMo-7B-0724-Instruct-hf43#1441
14Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)40.91#1255
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct40.34#1017

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-context-worldsense-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.