AbstentionBench - underspecified context - UMWP - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified context - UMWP - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B100#848
2Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO100#992
3O199.85#190
4Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B99.77#499
5GPT-4o99.74#357
6Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO99.65#732
7DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B99.6#614
8Llama 3.1 70B Instruct99.6#567
9Llama 3.3 70B Instruct99.47#541
10Llama 3.1 8B Instruct99.36#1017
11Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct99.14#509
12Gemini 1.5 Pro98.68#454
13Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT98.25#977
14OLMo-7B-0724-Instruct-hf95.32#1441
15Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)93.07#1255

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-context-umwp-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.