AbstentionBench - underspecified context - QASPER - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified context - QASPER - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1OLMo-7B-0724-Instruct-hf30.17#1441
2Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO29.07#992
3Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B28.79#848
4Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO26.64#732
5DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B26.47#614
6Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct26.28#509
7Llama 3.3 70B Instruct26.03#541
8Llama 3.1 8B Instruct25.99#1017
9Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B25.43#499
10Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)25.08#1255
11Llama 3.1 405B Instruct25#470
12GPT-4o23.68#357
13Llama 3.1 70B Instruct23.59#567
14Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT23.14#977
15Gemini 1.5 Pro21.49#454

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-context-qasper-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.