AbstentionBench - underspecified context - MMLU Math - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified context - MMLU Math - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct100#541
2Gemini 1.5 Pro100#454
3Llama 3.1 405B Instruct100#470
4O1 (High)100#190 (O1)
5Llama 3.1 70B Instruct98.99#567
6O198.94#190
7Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct98.85#509
8Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO97.65#732
9Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT97.37#977
10GPT-4o96.94#357
11Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B96.77#848
12Llama 3.1 8B Instruct96.67#1017
13Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO93.18#992
14DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B91.84#614
15TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.088.89#1547

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-context-mmlu-math-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.