AbstentionBench - underspecified context - MediQ - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified context - MediQ - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B100#848
2GPT-4o99.39#357
3Llama 3.1 405B Instruct99.35#470
4Llama 3.1 70B Instruct99.22#567
5Llama 3.1 70B99.09#588
6Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B99.07#499
7Llama 3.1 8B98.92#1130
8Gemini 1.5 Pro98.62#454
9O198.53#190
10Llama 3.3 70B Instruct98.19#541
11Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO97.79#732
12Llama 3.1 8B Instruct97.41#1017
13DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B96.23#614
14Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)95.58#1255
15Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT95.45#977

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-context-mediq-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.