AbstentionBench - underspecified context - BB/Disambiguate - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports underspecified context - BB/Disambiguate - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B72.73#499
2Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO63.41#732
3DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B54.05#614
4Llama 3.1 8B53.57#1130
5Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B53.57#848
6Llama 3.1 70B52.67#588
7OLMo-7B-0724-Instruct-hf52.38#1441
8Llama 3.1 405B Instruct48.53#470
9Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)47.62#1255
10O146.67#190
11Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct46.53#509
12Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO46.15#992
13Llama 3.1 70B Instruct45#567
14Llama 3.3 70B Instruct43.98#541
15Gemini 1.5 Pro39.74#454

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-underspecified-context-bb-disambiguate-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.