AbstentionBench - subjective - MoralChoice - F1: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports subjective - MoralChoice - F1 as Abstention F1 (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention F1 (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 3.1 70B56.73#588
2Llama 3.1 8B45.75#1130
3Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B45.65#499
4Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO45.12#732
5O144.95#190
6Llama 3.1 405B Instruct43.71#470
7Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO43.3#992
8Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)41.75#1255
9Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B41.48#848
10GPT-4o41.35#357
11Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct41.3#509
12Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT40.75#977
13Llama 3.1 8B Instruct40.19#1017
14Llama 3.3 70B Instruct38.92#541
15Llama 3.1 70B Instruct38.92#567

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-subjective-moralchoice-f1 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.