AbstentionBench - false premise - FalseQA - Precision: leaderboard

AbstentionBench evaluates whether a model appropriately declines unanswerable or underspecified questions. This slice reports false premise - FalseQA - Precision as Abstention Precision (%); values converted from 0-1 to percent. Precision and recall must be read together: always abstaining is not necessarily useful. Scenario/dataset pairs and SFT/DPO/RL checkpoints remain separate; no synthetic overall average. Source: facebookresearch/AbstentionBench analysis/abstention_performance.csv.

Metric: Abstention Precision (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B93.63#614
2GPT-4o90.59#357
3Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct89.07#509
4Llama 3.1 70B Instruct88.67#567
5Llama 3.3 70B Instruct88.35#541
6Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B88.22#499
7Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)87.62#1255
8Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B87.54#848
9Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B-DPO87.44#732
10Llama 3.1 405B Instruct86.25#470
11Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-DPO85.8#992
12O184.99#190
13Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT84.38#977
14Llama 3.1 8B Instruct83.46#1017
15Gemini 1.5 Pro83.45#454

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=abstentionbench-false-premise-falseqa-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.