6G-Bench - Network Slicing and Resource Management: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the network slicing and resource management tasks (T4-T8, T13, T14, T16, T29) of 6G-Bench's 3,722 expert-validated four-option multiple-choice questions on network-level semantic reasoning for AI-native 6G networks, deterministic single-shot answers (temperature 0, one letter in a JSON object), group score is the unweighted mean of its task accuracies; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 4 Maverick80.5#451
2Qwen3 Coder Next78.6#321
3Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct76.9#291
4DeepSeek V3.276.1#198
5GPT-5.2 Instant76#205
6Ministral 3 14B75.9#636
7GPT-4o Mini75.7#588
8GPT-5.2 Codex75.4#89
9Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct75.3#754
10Ministral 3 8B74.9#676
11DeepSeek V3.2 Exp74.5#227
12Claude Haiku 4.574.2#271
13Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct72.8#276
14Phi-472.5#701
15GPT-5 Mini71.5#176

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=6g-bench-network-slicing-and-resource-management · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.