Video-MemComp OVO - ATR: leaderboard

Video-MemComp v1: streaming evaluation of official development sets. Table 1 mixes reproduced starred rows and results from prior papers; frame sampling and average KV budget differ by system and remain in row identity. Backbone checkpoint revision and decoding are not fully specified; source-qualified systems are retained. This is video QA under cache compression, not an unmodified backbone score. Appendix F: choice-based streaming OVO-Bench; Qwen2.5-VL-7B compression hyperparameters tuned for this benchmark, 4K KV versus approximately50K baseline. ATR. Metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Video-MemComp LLaVA-OneVision-7B [OVO; frames 64; KV ≈ \approx 10K]69.8
2Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B [OVO; frames 1fps; KV ≈ \approx 50K]69.8
3Video-MemComp InternVL-V2-8B [OVO; frames 64; KV ≈ \approx 10K]69
4Video-MemComp LLaVA-NeXT-7B [OVO; frames 64; KV ≈ \approx 10K]66.4
5Video-MemComp TimeChat-Online-7B [OVO; frames 1fps; KV ≈ \approx 5K]64.7
6Video-MemComp Qwen2-VL-7B [OVO; frames 64; KV ≈ \approx 10K]63.8
7Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Video-MemComp [OVO; frames 1fps; KV 4K]62.9

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=video-memcomp-ovo-atr · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-27.