Video-MemComp OVO Allocation Weights - CRR: leaderboard

Video-MemComp v1: streaming evaluation of official development sets. Table 1 mixes reproduced starred rows and results from prior papers; frame sampling and average KV budget differ by system and remain in row identity. Backbone checkpoint revision and decoding are not fully specified; source-qualified systems are retained. This is video QA under cache compression, not an unmodified backbone score. Appendix F identifies Qwen2.5-VL-7B on OVO. These are distinct hyperparameter arms evaluated on the same questions, not independently sampled tasks; preserve every configuration. CRR. Metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.30, 0.675, 0.025]46.25
2Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.275, 0.675, 0.05]45.42
3Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.30, 0.65, 0.05]45.42
4Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.70, 0.20, 0.10]45.42
5Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.35, 0.625, 0.025]45
6Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.10, 0.85, 0.05]44.58
7Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.50, 0.40, 0.10]44.58
8Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.10, 0.90, 0.00]43.75
9Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.30, 0.30, 0.40]43.75
10Video-MemComp Qwen2.5-VL-7B Allocation Weights [0.675, 0.275, 0.05]43.75

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=video-memcomp-ovo-allocation-weights-crr · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-27.