TrustGen - TrustLLM Internal: leaderboard

TrustGen - TrustLLM Internal. TrustGen paper 2502.14296v2 provides native accuracy measurements and exact model versions in Table 5. Internal question answering uses parametric knowledge; fact checking classifies claims against supplied evidence rather than using a live retrieval system. Dynamic QA comes from Wikipedia and dynamic fact checking from fact-checking websites, with varied prompt formats. TrustLLM columns use the paper’s dataset pool and LLM judging against reference answers. HallusionBench and AutoHallusion are the paper’s visual-question evaluations, with their reported subsets kept separate. These source-specific runs are not automatically fused with another publisher’s results. QwQ-32B is held because the table does not distinguish its preview or released checkpoint. Reported metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o (2024-08-06)74.75#339
2O1 Preview (2024-09-12)74.43#215
3GLM-4 Plus70.25#397
4Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (v0.1)70#755
5Llama 3.1 70B Instruct69.25#568
6Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620)69#305
7Yi Lightning68.75#423
8DeepSeek V2.567.75#490
9Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct66.42#463
10O1 Mini (2024-09-12)66.24#411
11Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)65.91#361
12GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)65.66#562
13GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125)65#984
14Gemma 2 27B (IT)64.75#653
15Claude 3 Haiku (20240307)61#781

No result here: #5 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trustgen-trustllm-internal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-25.