TrustGen - Dynamic QA: leaderboard

TrustGen - Dynamic QA. TrustGen paper 2502.14296v2 provides native accuracy measurements and exact model versions in Table 5. Internal question answering uses parametric knowledge; fact checking classifies claims against supplied evidence rather than using a live retrieval system. Dynamic QA comes from Wikipedia and dynamic fact checking from fact-checking websites, with varied prompt formats. TrustLLM columns use the paper’s dataset pool and LLM judging against reference answers. HallusionBench and AutoHallusion are the paper’s visual-question evaluations, with their reported subsets kept separate. These source-specific runs are not automatically fused with another publisher’s results. QwQ-32B is held because the table does not distinguish its preview or released checkpoint. Reported metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o (2024-08-06)81.25#339
2O1 Preview (2024-09-12)79.5#215
3Llama 3.1 70B Instruct78.12#568
4DeepSeek V2.578.12#490
5Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620)77.08#305
6Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (v0.1)77.08#755
7Yi Lightning77.08#423
8Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct76.04#463
9GLM-4 Plus76.04#397
10O1 Mini (2024-09-12)75.5#411
11Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)75.26#361
12GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125)75#984
13Gemma 2 27B (IT)74.48#653
14Claude 3 Haiku (20240307)73.44#781
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct72.4#1044

No result here: #5 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trustgen-dynamic-qa · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-25.