TrustGen - AutoHallusion Overall: leaderboard

TrustGen - AutoHallusion Overall. TrustGen paper 2502.14296v2 provides native accuracy measurements and exact model versions in Table 5. Internal question answering uses parametric knowledge; fact checking classifies claims against supplied evidence rather than using a live retrieval system. Dynamic QA comes from Wikipedia and dynamic fact checking from fact-checking websites, with varied prompt formats. TrustLLM columns use the paper’s dataset pool and LLM judging against reference answers. HallusionBench and AutoHallusion are the paper’s visual-question evaluations, with their reported subsets kept separate. These source-specific runs are not automatically fused with another publisher’s results. QwQ-32B is held because the table does not distinguish its preview or released checkpoint. Reported metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620)71.14#305
2GPT-4o (2024-08-06)71.14#339
3Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)67.66#361
4Gemini 1.5 Flash (002)62.69#589
5Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct57.71#628
6Claude 3 Haiku (20240307)55.22#781
7GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)54.23#562
8Llama 3.2 Vision 11B Instruct46.77#1025

No result here: #5 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=trustgen-autohallusion-overall · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-25.