SciDiagramEdit - AutoFigure-Edit Structure and Texture: leaderboard
SciDiagramEdit paper v1 test split from 364 author-revision figure pairs. Semantic and aesthetic win rates use blind pairs against the author's revised figure, judged by Claude Opus 4.7. The train/validation/test split is 2:1:3. Native fractions are retained; superscript improvements are not the score. Single-pass code editing baseline; no Coach skill-evolution loop. Table 2 condition: AutoFigure-Edit. Checklist success is judged against atomic edit requirements. IAA and ISTA are UniPercept scores on a 0–100 scale; pairwise win rates and success are fractions. Metric: UniPercept score (0–100).
Metric: UniPercept score (0–100). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around May 2028. 3 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5 | 41.37 | #31 |
| 2 | GPT-5.4 | 41.35 | #84 |
| 3 | GPT-5.3 | 41.24 | #99 |
No result here: #5 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=scidiagramedit-autofigure-edit-structure-and-texture · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-26.