NimCritic LOOM - Overall Terminal Success Accuracy: leaderboard

NimCritic v1 visual manipulation-progress evaluation, not action execution. LOOM: 300 trajectories, 19,618 calibrated frames, 171 single-task and 129 multi-task; duration-weighted Spearman forward/reverse correlations, signed harmonic PRC-F1 (zero on opposite signs) and terminal completion accuracy with reference progress > 0.99. Native baseline interfaces/output definitions retained. GVL shuffles up to 30 frames, temperature 1; GPT-6 Sol extra reasoning disabled. NimCritic is a separately trained Wan2.2-TI2V-5B-initialized critic with frozen UMT5-XXL,128,000 updates and 20 Euler inference steps; Gemini 3.8 Flash decomposes subtasks. Other checkpoint revisions/efforts unreported; no aliases to untrained backbones. Metric: Terminal Success Accuracy.

Metric: Terminal Success Accuracy. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1NimCritic (Harness: Gemini 3.8 Flash subtask decomposition)0.92
2NimCritic study GPT-6 Sol (no reasoning) (Harness: GVL)0.65
3Gemini 3.8 Flash (Harness: GVL)0.6
4NimCritic study VLAC-CUT0.6
5NimCritic study Robometer 4B0.56
6NimCritic study RoboDopamine-GRM-2 8B0.29
7NimCritic study RynnValue 4B0.28
8NimCritic study ProcVLM 2B0.26
9NimCritic study LRM0.23
10NimCritic study VLAC-Critic 8B0.19

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nimcritic-loom-overall-terminal-success-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-27.