LookZoom Component Ablation 98 - Five-Benchmark Average: leaderboard

LookZoom v1: Qwen3-VL-Instruct at 2B/4B/8B. Fixed 500-question subsets (seed 0) of DocVQA val (ANLS),InfographicVQA val (ANLS),ChartQA test (relaxed accuracy),TextVQA val (VQA accuracy), plus 300 held-out V-CoT-Doc (strict match). Per-view budget B means B * 32^2 pixels preserving aspect ratio, not total tokens. Single view/AttWarp/replace answer from 1 view; ViCrop/ground-then-crop/GapSight/LookZoom use 2. LookZoom reader uses GRPO LoRA; pointer trained from own correct answers; GapSight is authors reimplementation. Distinct trained systems remain separate. Table3: fixed 4B, exact view/pointer/reader arm retained. Exclude best-fixed-view-per-budget oracle selection from model roster. Five-Benchmark Average. Metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Per-sample action head ( ours )63.6
2LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Square .5 .5 , <look> token62.9
3LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Action head without adaptive windows62.9
4LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Adapt. window, <look> token62.5
5LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Square .5 .5 , pre-answer, same layers62.4
6LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Crop .7 .7 , pre-answer, same layers58.2
7LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B RL reader, crop .7 .7 (decision)58.2
8LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Crop .7 .7 , <look> token57.8
9LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Adapt. window, pre-answer, best layers †56.8
10LookZoom Qwen3-VL-4B Base reader, crop .7 .7 (decision)56.7

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=lookzoom-component-ablation-98-five-benchmark-average · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-27.