FrontierCS 2 - SQL Counterexample Search: leaderboard

FrontierCS 2 selected formal runs on 48 research engineering tasks, with each source-native coding harness. Paper v1 Table 3 fixes the effort settings; the subsequently added DeepSeek 1017 row leaves effort unspecified. Superseded attempts are not selected by score. Native bounded task scores are distinct from human-reference margins and from pass/fail verdicts. Explicit failed-run zeroes remain zero; unreported scores remain missing. Metric: Task score (0–100).

Metric: Task score (0–100). Source: frontier-cs.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GLM-5.3 (Max)97.66#39 (GLM-5.3)
2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)97.66#27
3Gemini 4 Argon (High)96.57#8 (Gemini 4 Argon)
4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)95.93#35 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
5GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)95.93#72 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
6Muse Spark 1.3 (High)95.93#29 (Muse Spark 1.3)
7GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)95.84#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
8Kimi K3 (High)95.84#33 (Kimi K3)
9Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)95.55#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
10Muse Wonder (Max)95.44#15 (Muse Wonder)
11GPT-6.1 Sol (xHigh)92.95#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)

No result here: #9 Claude Fable 5.1, #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontiercs-2-sql-counterexample-search · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-26.