FrontierCS 2 - Pass Rate: leaderboard

FrontierCS 2 native website aggregate snapshot over 48 research engineering tasks. These values are independently published by the website, not recomputed from the separately updated formal-run snapshot. Each source-native coding harness and reviewed Table 3 effort setting is retained; DeepSeek 1017 effort is unspecified. FCI uses Kimi K2.7 as its zero anchor; the index is not a percentage or a human score. Metric: Pass rate (%).

Metric: Pass rate (%). Source: frontier-cs.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2028. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)58.3#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
2GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)43.8#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
3Gemini 4 Argon (High)39.6#8 (Gemini 4 Argon)
4GPT-6.1 Sol (xHigh)35.4#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
5GLM-5.3 (Max)25#39 (GLM-5.3)
6Muse Wonder (Max)20.8#15 (Muse Wonder)
7Kimi K3 (High)20.8#33 (Kimi K3)
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)16.7#27
9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)14.6#35 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
10GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)12.5#72 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
11Muse Spark 1.3 (High)12.5#29 (Muse Spark 1.3)

No result here: #9 Claude Fable 5.1, #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontiercs-2-pass-rate · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-26.