FrontierCS 2 - Join-Tree Rewriting: leaderboard

FrontierCS 2 selected formal runs on 48 research engineering tasks, with each source-native coding harness. Paper v1 Table 3 fixes the effort settings; the subsequently added DeepSeek 1017 row leaves effort unspecified. Superseded attempts are not selected by score. Native bounded task scores are distinct from human-reference margins and from pass/fail verdicts. Explicit failed-run zeroes remain zero; unreported scores remain missing. Metric: Task score (0–100).

Metric: Task score (0–100). Source: frontier-cs.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2035. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 4 Argon (High)12.19#8 (Gemini 4 Argon)
2GPT-6.1 Sol (xHigh)12.02#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
3Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)11.8#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
4Kimi K3 (High)10.9#33 (Kimi K3)
5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)10.86#27
6GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)10.79#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
7Muse Wonder (Max)10.7#15 (Muse Wonder)
8GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)10.67#72 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
9GLM-5.3 (Max)10.46#39 (GLM-5.3)
10Muse Spark 1.3 (High)10.24#29 (Muse Spark 1.3)
11DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)0#35 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)

No result here: #9 Claude Fable 5.1, #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontiercs-2-join-tree-rewriting · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-26.