FrontierCS 2 - Access-Pattern Rewriting: leaderboard

FrontierCS 2 selected formal runs on 48 research engineering tasks, with each source-native coding harness. Paper v1 Table 3 fixes the effort settings; the subsequently added DeepSeek 1017 row leaves effort unspecified. Superseded attempts are not selected by score. Native bounded task scores are distinct from human-reference margins and from pass/fail verdicts. Explicit failed-run zeroes remain zero; unreported scores remain missing. Metric: Task score (0–100).

Metric: Task score (0–100). Source: frontier-cs.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)91.04#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
2Gemini 4 Argon (High)91.03#8 (Gemini 4 Argon)
3GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)91.03#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
4GPT-6.1 Sol (xHigh)91.01#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
5Kimi K3 (High)90.84#33 (Kimi K3)
6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)90.63#35 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
7GLM-5.3 (Max)90.49#39 (GLM-5.3)
8Muse Wonder (Max)90.46#15 (Muse Wonder)
9GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)90.07#72 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
10Muse Spark 1.3 (High)82.88#29 (Muse Spark 1.3)
11DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)0#27

No result here: #9 Claude Fable 5.1, #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=frontiercs-2-access-pattern-rewriting · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-26.