Fangcun DeepSeek 1017 Report - GDM Self-Reasoning configuration tasks: leaderboard

Fangcun report 2610.35671v1, hosted API evaluations Oct 4–25 2026; Appendix A.1 exact model identities, maximum reasoning effort unless named otherwise, temperature 1/top_p 0.95. GLM 5.3 judge where required. API/format failures excluded by source; common cohort versus successfully completed denominators retained. Primary PDF printed values, not estimated plot heights. Figure 1.2b: 4 DeepSeek models, 9 runtime-configuration challenges, 10 trials each. Successful task rate; permanent configuration changes are a separate behavior measure, not additional capability outcomes. Two nonconfiguration challenges excluded by native design. Metric: Accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 4 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)53.3#36 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
2DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)52.2#109 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (Max)51.1#25 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017))
4DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)21.1#147 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)

No result here: #2 Claude Opus 5.5, #3 GPT-6 Astra, #6 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=fangcun-deepseek-1017-report-gdm-self-reasoning-configuration-tasks · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-28.