Evolve on Graph Five-Task Average - F1: leaderboard

Evolve on Graph v1 evaluates knowledge-graph reasoning using direct answers, chain of thought, self-consistency, ReAct, retrieval, or separately trained Solver/Proposer systems. It uses Qwen2.5-3B/7B-Instruct and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct. Training lasts 140 steps, with 5 rollouts per task and at most 15 assistant turns. Hit@1 requires an exact normalized match to any gold answer; F1 measures overlap between predicted and gold answer lists. Freebase, Wikidata, and task-specific KG-R1 training scopes remain distinct. Trained weights are not aliased to the instruction backbone. Main Avg for supervised rows pools only 3 or 2 tasks, making it incomparable to the 5-task average. These remain separate task-support populations. Metric: F1 (%).

Metric: F1 (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct EoG56.31
2EoG study LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct EoG53.91
3EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct Graph Reranker44.26
4EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct ToG43.66
5EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct CoR42.29
6EoG study Qwen-2.5-3B-Instruct EoG42.03
7EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct Text-Based Retrieval40.92
8EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct PoG37.75
9EoG study Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct ReAct31.62
10EoG study LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct ReAct26.09

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evolve-on-graph-five-task-average-f1 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-28.