EvoHarmBench - Gambling and Fraud: leaderboard

EvoHarmBench (Findings of EMNLP 2026) attacks LLM content moderators with an adaptive DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp loop that evolves human-like rewriting strategies over 12 rounds for clusters of real harmful posts. ASR@Readable in percent counts rewrites that evade the moderator while keeping recognizable harmful intent; lower is better for the moderator. Mean over the gambling and fraud clusters.

Metric: ASR@Readable (%; mean over the gambling and fraud sub-clusters of the share of adversarial rewrites that succeed against the moderator; 229 semantic sub-clusters built from 5,002 real-world adversarial posts in five violation categories; an adaptive DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp rewriter, reflector and comparison model evolve cluster-level rewriting strategies against the target moderator for 12 rounds; a rewrite counts only if it both evades the moderator and keeps human-recognizable harmful intent). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2028. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)71.2#91
2Claude Sonnet 4.684.5#158
3GLM-5.190.5#175
4Qwen 3.6 Plus92.1#217
5DeepSeek V4 Pro95.1#181
6Kimi K2.697.6#173
7GPT-5.597.7#48
8DeepSeek-V2-Lite99.3#8600
9Qwen 3 8B99.5#1838
10Qwen 3 4B99.7#2297

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evoharmbench-gambling-and-fraud · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.