EvoHarmBench - Advertising and Traffic Diversion: leaderboard

EvoHarmBench (Findings of EMNLP 2026) attacks LLM content moderators with an adaptive DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp loop that evolves human-like rewriting strategies over 12 rounds for clusters of real harmful posts. ASR@Readable in percent counts rewrites that evade the moderator while keeping recognizable harmful intent; lower is better for the moderator. Mean over the advertising and traffic-diversion clusters.

Metric: ASR@Readable (%; mean over the advertising and traffic diversion sub-clusters of the share of adversarial rewrites that succeed against the moderator; 229 semantic sub-clusters built from 5,002 real-world adversarial posts in five violation categories; an adaptive DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp rewriter, reflector and comparison model evolve cluster-level rewriting strategies against the target moderator for 12 rounds; a rewrite counts only if it both evades the moderator and keeps human-recognizable harmful intent). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2037. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.679.2#158
2Kimi K2.681#173
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)81.6#91
4Qwen 3 8B81.7#1838
5Qwen 3.6 Plus81.9#217
6GPT-5.582#48
7DeepSeek V4 Pro82.7#181
8Qwen 3 4B83.5#2297
9GLM-5.187.2#175
10DeepSeek-V2-Lite88.6#8600

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evoharmbench-advertising-and-traffic-diversion · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.