EvoHarmBench - Abusive Content: leaderboard

EvoHarmBench (Findings of EMNLP 2026) attacks LLM content moderators with an adaptive DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp loop that evolves human-like rewriting strategies over 12 rounds for clusters of real harmful posts. ASR@Readable in percent counts rewrites that evade the moderator while keeping recognizable harmful intent; lower is better for the moderator. Mean over the abusive-content clusters.

Metric: ASR@Readable (%; mean over the abusive content sub-clusters of the share of adversarial rewrites that succeed against the moderator; 229 semantic sub-clusters built from 5,002 real-world adversarial posts in five violation categories; an adaptive DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp rewriter, reflector and comparison model evolve cluster-level rewriting strategies against the target moderator for 12 rounds; a rewrite counts only if it both evades the moderator and keeps human-recognizable harmful intent). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.546.8#48
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)48.3#91
3Claude Sonnet 4.657.4#158
4Qwen 3.6 Plus62.2#217
5DeepSeek V4 Pro71.1#181
6Kimi K2.673.1#173
7GLM-5.178.6#175
8Qwen 3 8B93.2#1838
9DeepSeek-V2-Lite96.8#8600
10Qwen 3 4B98.3#2297

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=evoharmbench-abusive-content · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.