BacktestBench - Ticker Selection: leaderboard

Metric: Back-test accuracy (%) on the Ticker Selection task family (selecting the stock a natural-language strategy would pick), synthetic BacktestBench test split (the expert-crafted subset excluded), each model driving the AutoBacktest pipeline of the authors (Summarizer, SQL Retriever and Python Coder agents) over a PostgreSQL market database, temperature 0.6; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 23 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Pro90.37
2Seed 1.885.83
3Qwen 3 Max85.56
4Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)82.26
5MiniMax-M2.181.71
6GLM-4.780.33
7DeepSeek V3.279.78
8Qwen 3 32B75.93
9GPT-OSS-120B74
10MiMo-V2-Flash73.04
11Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)71.25
12Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B (Thinking)67.4
13Kimi K2 (Thinking)66.57
14Qwen 3 Coder Plus63.41
15Qwen 3 14B62.04

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=backtestbench-ticker-selection · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.